Sunday, November 13, 2011

Cross-examination of a neurosurgeon - Part 3


You will recall that I left this story with the ducks lined up for the second goal.  The doctor wrote in his report that the accident was not the cause of my client's symptoms.  For those of you new to legal principles in ICBC claims, a plaintiff (the injured person) must prove that the accident was a legal cause of the injury - the principle is called causation.


The second goal was to get the doctor to reverse his opinion causation


I started with a couple of accepted medical facts....


For the rest of this post, please visit my new blog at:


www.personal-injury-lawyer-vancouver.blogspot.com


Labels: , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

At 12:38 PM, Anonymous prozac and birth defects said...

Some story.

 
At 2:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the information. It is hard to find a Vancouver BC lawyer. Thank you for your help.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home