Another McComb Witten Trail Win

ICBC often tells people that there is not enough damage to their vehicle, so ICBC is not going to consider compensation for the person (ICBC calls this a LVI or low velocity impact claim). This position can be a real hardship for some people who have actually been injured in an accident.

I recently did a trial for such a case, Eom v. Chand, reasons unpublished.

On July 6, 2011 Justice Leask provided oral reasons for the trial. Until days before the trial, ICBC refused to make any offer to Ms. Eom. When the judgment came in, it was for 12 times what ICBC finally did offer. At trial, ICBC said that Ms. Eom recovered within two months of the accident. The problem with that theory is that the evidence of physiotherapist, Angelica Reeve (who Justice Leask called the most impressive physiotherapist he has had testify before him). She was highly trained with a Master's degree from one of the top universities in the world and Angelica testified that she could feel that the joints in Ms. Eom's neck were not moving properly when she treated Ms. Eom. ICBC's theory also did not take into account the fact that Ms. Eom's doctor told the judge that she thought Ms. Eom was only 50-60% recovered at the time of the trial.

ICBC attacked the credibility of my client, her doctor, the physiotherapist. None of the attacks had any merit, but these are the tactics that people often face when in trial. ICBC never came up with any theory that factored in the fact that Ms. Eom, her doctor, and her physiotherapist, may actually have been telling the truth.

In the end, ICBC told the judge that her claim was worth as little as $2000 dollars. Ms. Eom had more in "out of pocket expenses" than that. Justice Leask awarded Ms. Eom $132,042.20 for this so called "LVI denial".

I don't think that the people at ICBC are bad, in fact I have quite a lot of respect for many of the people I deal with at ICBC. Sometimes, however, the bureaucracy of the ICBC machine can squash you unless you have the will and tools (including a good lawyer) to fight for your rights.

Congratulations to Ms. Eom who had that courage to withstand these attacks and candidly tell the judge her story.

By the way, if you are looking for a good physiotherapist in North Vancouver, I can recommend Angelica Reeve at 19th Street Physiotherapy 604-988-5221.

Check out my new updated blog at:

http://personal-injury-lawyer-vancouver.blogspot.com/

Find answers to your ICBC claims at my new blog

Unfortunately, Blogger is no longer supporting changes to this template and I can do little more than add text.  I'll save you from a technical explanation, but I have had to create a new blog.  Find my new blog at:

http://personal-injury-lawyer-vancouver.blogspot.com/

Need a Physiotherapist in North Vancouver?

In an oral judgment for a ICBC claim for a Vancouver car accident, Justice Leask commended the knowledge and skill of physiotherapist Angelica Reeve of 19th Street Physiotherapy.  Justice Leask confirmed my own opinion of Ms. Reeve when he described her as "extremely professional and thorough."  He went on to say that he accepted her evidence without reservation.

To Ms. Reeve's credit, Justice Leask described Ms. Reeve as the best physiotherapist that he ever had testify in his court.

I can confirm that Ms. Reeve was impressive in her knowledge and had a passion for her work.  Although I have never been a patient, I can say without hesitation that anybody looking for a good physiotherapist in North Vancouver would be well served to give Angelica Reeve a call at 19th Street Physiotherapy.

To make it easy, here is the contact info:

19th Street Physiotherapy
224 West 19th Ave, (the office looks like a house, but it really is the office)
North Vancouver
604-988-5221

Check out the website:

http://www.19physio.com/staff.html

Diminished Housekeeping Capacity

In my last post before taking a hiatus (November 2006), I wrote about how the law is changing to better reward unpaid housework which is largely performed by women.  Since then I have done two trials where loss of housekeeping capacity formed a significant part of the award.

In O'Rourke v. Everett, 2009 BCSC 1277, the judge awarded my client $18,720 for loss of housekeeping capacity.  The replacement work was performed by her husband.  The law does not, nor should it, require that the work be paid for by an outside provider.  The logic is that wealthy people can afford to replace the loss of housekeeping services, where modest income people could not.  Therefore the rich would be receiving better treatment under the law. In reality, that statement is probably true, however, our courts in British Columbia strive to develop case law consistent with equality values in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Read the case for yourself:

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/12/2009BCSC1277.htm

In Grewal-Cheema v. Tassone, 2010 BCSC 1182 the judge awarded $12,000 for loss of childcare services for the time that Ms. Grewal-Cheema was attending rehabilitation treatments.  Ms. Grewal-Cheema's husband rearranged his schedule to look after their child while his wife was at treatment.  The loss, however, is Ms. Grewal-Cheema's and not the husband's.  This type of claim is easy to overlook, but can be the difference between winning and losing a case.  Here is a link:
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/10/11/2010BCSC1182.htm

To my colleagues - I encourage you to push the law to drive towards equality.

To my clients - I give you my committment to know the law and search out evidence with you to prove all elements of your ICBC claim.

PT Health Physiotherapy

I would like to thank all of the physiotherapists that came out for the presentation on giving evidence at trial in a vancouver personal injury claim.

It is a testiment to the committment to their clients that PT Health and their physiotherapists are learning the skills needed to help their patients.

If you need a physiotherapist for your car accident in Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, Squamish, I can recommend the committed people at PT Health.

ICBC Claim goes sideways

As I was getting my news (Canucks) hit from the Vancouver Sun, I saw a link to an article titled:

B.C. woman rear-ended in accident may lose driver's licence

www.vancouversun.com/technology/woman+rear+ended+accident+lose+driver+licence/4832794/story.html

The story is essentially about a woman who was injured in an accident that wasn't her fault, but she still owes money to ICBC to the tune of about $42,000.

The issue this woman faces is that, according to the judge, she seemed to have sued the wrong person.  The person that ran into her said she slipped on an oily substance on the road.  The owner of the vehicle leaking the oily substance was not discussed by the judge, but it seems that she did not sue the "John Doe" or ICBC.  I don't know when she hired her lawyer, but the person that was negligent was not known to her and the hit and run provisions would have applied to her.

If you have a hit and run situation, you have very, very strict obligations - failing which your claim could be dismissed and you would owe money just like this poor lady.  It highlights the importance of hiring a lawyer for your ICBC claim.

If you have questions call me at McComb Witten at 604-255-9018.